[xenator]

Seems like they know about ParadeDB, but for some reason don't publish banchmarks:

"""Another solution is ParadeDB, which pushes full-text search queries down to Tantivy for results. It supports BM25 scoring and complex query patterns like negative terms, aiming to be a complete replacement for ElasticSearch. However, it uses its own unique syntax for filtering and querying and delegates filtering operations to Tantivy instead of relying on Postgres directly. Its implementation requires several hooks into Postgres' query planning and storage, potentially leading to compatibility issues."""

So it is more apples to red than equal comparison.

[philippemnoel]

Hi folks, ParadeDB author here. We had benchmarks, but they were super outdated. We just made new ones, and will soon make a biiiig announcement with big new benchmarks. You can see some existing benchmarks vs Lucene here: https://www.paradedb.com/blog/case_study_alibaba

This comparison isn't super fair -- ParadeDB does not have compatibility issues with Postgres and rather is directly integrated into Postgres block storage, query planner, and query executor