Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by TeMPOraL 480 days ago
All of them sucked, though. Turns out, running regression on some features picked as much to help the user as to satisfy business objectives, doesn't lead to a system that can capture one's preferences well.

LLMs have the benefit of understanding (or some values of understanding) how people feel about things in general, in a global sense. They may not have a database of people's choices, but they have a "database" of connotations for every word, how ideas and emotions relate, how interests connect, etc. Instead of relying on a relatively tiny historical record of choices in few, specific (and ill-defined) categories, they can just place user's history in their 10 000 dimensional latent space and use that as a direction to explore, effectively guessing whatever the user's actual preferences are likely to be, without being able to name them or fit into explicit categories.

1 comments

The best recommendation system I encountered was the "similar artists" cloud on what.cd on an artists page. Has never failed me.

https://github.com/WhatCD/Gazelle/blob/master/classes/artist...