[ImPostingOnHN]

Since those are only 2 options, and there are many more options, I'll pick option 3: convince people to value and fund universal education more from preschool on, building a better foundation for engineers and other professions in the decades following.

In addition to that, it'd be cool if the blameless postmortems were made public, so everyone could learn from them.

As for the other 2 options of restricting freedom, and extremely blameful postmortems, I reject both.

[Eisenstein]

Yes, being held accountable for your decisions is a restriction on your freedom.

[ImPostingOnHN]

I still choose the third option, because it is the better of the three, compared to restricting what functionality the software people write is allowed to have, and extremely blameful postmortems (which are bad).

[Eisenstein]

All restrictions are bad, and accountability is bad. Got it. I'm glad to have had this discussion with you; very thought provoking.

[ImPostingOnHN]

Again, I still choose the third option, because it is the better of the three, compared to restricting what functionality the software people write is allowed to have, and extremely blameful postmortems (which are bad).

You seem really stuck on the first two options. Why does it matter, given that the third is the best? Do you still insist upon a false dichotomy?

[Eisenstein]

It isn't exactly surprising that someone who is the beneficiary of a system which has no accountability is against the imposing of such, I was just hoping you had something better to offer back than 'I don't like it' and assertions that something is bad without ever explaining why. I have no idea why 'blameful postmortems' are bad because you never told me, you just say it is. Why should I change my mind in that case?

[ImPostingOnHN]

>I have no idea why 'blameful postmortems' are bad because you never told me

Usually when you don't know something, you ask someone who knows. Since you sort-of asked here, I'll give you the answer:

Blameless postmortems lead to fewer failures, which is ostensibly the goal here. So what do you get from your idea of blameful ones? Feeling good about punishing someone, even though you're increasing failures by doing so?