[michaelcampbell]

> > which is mostly around privacy and not being Google.

> I don't understand why you're framing this as though those were mutually exclusive.

They... didn't? If you frame it "mostly around (privacy and not being Google)" and not "(mostly around privacy) and (not being Google)". But even the "and" doesn't seem exclusive to me.

[glenstein]

That's not the thing I'm referring to as mutually exclusive. I'm talking about (1) side bets and (2) commitments to privacy and not being Google.

I'm juxtaposing one and two, but you seem to think I'm juxtaposing the two elements within two.