[throwmeme888]

this article is just a summary of things curtis yarvin originally said over 5 years ago and a Marinetti article that was in new scientist a few weeks back

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26535290-100-how-futu...

in short, this substack article share by op is probably just ai generated slop

[soulofmischief]

On what basis do you make this accusation? Does HN need a new rule specifying what the other rules already explain? Give OP the benefit of the doubt. I read the entire article and it was absolutely not LLM-generated.

[jgalt212]

The word count for "delve" is zero, so maybe not AI slop.

[turnsout]

Is there ever a meaningful difference between a Substack post and AI slop?

[tbrownaw]

Despite what AI providers wish was the case, we do not in fact have general human-level AIs yet.

[turnsout]

I guess I've never read far enough into a 10,000 word Substack essay to judge

[wiltonn]

Maybe, but it makes you think.

[lucianbr]

It makes me think people can write things on the keyboard without the need for the things to make any sense.

Which is of course nothing new, but it does make me remember it.

[jonstewart]

Yeah, I am not sure who this author is but it is at least a useful summary of the dynamics and history of neoreactionary movement. I don’t think most small l-and-c liberals and conservatives have any idea of what they’re up against, and are simply bewildered by what’s happening.