|
|
|
|
|
by anonymars
481 days ago
|
|
If someone is winning, it must mean someone else is losing (hence the "deal" sums to zero) There is no comprehension that an agreement might actually benefit both sides This is presumably why you hear such things as "Canada is screwing us for 200 billion dollars a year" because we buy things from them Edit: you can see it in this thread, too. As though helping poor people could have no benefit to the rich I've seen it with people complaining about paying taxes for public transit, even though they only drive a car. Bonus points if they complain about traffic in the same rant without ever putting 2-and-2 together |
|