Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by baggy_trough 480 days ago
There are better ways than threading.
1 comments

Yeah, like pretending you aren't
I don't know what you mean.
If you write:

  int balance = 0;
  int get {...}
  void set(int balance) {...}
  void withdraw(int amt) {
    if amnt <= balance {
      balance -= amnt;
    }
  }
it will be flagged immediately in code review as a race condition and/or something that doesn't guarantee its implied balance>=0 invariant. Because threading.

But lift the logic up into a REST controller like pretty much all web app backends:

  GET /balance/get
  POST /balance/set
  POST /balance/withdraw
And it will sail straight through review. (Because we pretend each caller isn't its own Thread.)
You're right, we can't get away from concurrency control with database, cache, even the file system. I'm still happy to never have to think about in-process multithreading bugs.
async/await, for example.