Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by BSDobelix 481 days ago
>despite Mozilla working in the interest of users to a infinitely greater degree than any other major browser vendor.

Obviously not anymore, it's a add company now.

But at least they have "cool" party's in Zambia.

1 comments

> it's a add company now

Note that "any other major browser vendor" is a short list of ad companies with a much worse track record.

I don't think Apple (Safari) is a ad company.
Ah ok, but do they have a worse track-record then Google Microsoft or Mozilla?
Relative to Mozilla: on the advertising front I can't judge whether Apple is worse or about the same. On most other fronts I don't think there's much of a question. Others disagree, the extent to which Apple's actions are user-hostile is an often debated topic I'm not particularly interested in re-threading.

Google and Microsoft aren't really a comparison, both have been openly anti-user on many fronts for many years.

So let's correct your statement then to >>most other major browser vendor

;)

Huh? Those aren’t in-browser ads. Those are ads delivered through installed native apps.

Do you have a source showing that Safari makes money from ads?