| > And newer cohorts adapt their lifestyles and expectations to available technology, whether that's charging time, on-demand rental for the occasionally needed longer distance EVs, and so on. Alternatively, they will keep living their life exactly the way they have so far, and refuse to use the "new" technology until it has caught up with the "old" one. "Regulations" could in theory help, if it served as enough of an incentive for car makers to pay some serious R&D and get the "new" tech on par with the old one. Problem is, in practice, though, the option to "not care about the regulation and elect right wing people until it's dropped" is easier than paying chemist and physicists. And selling my mom a 2t SUV is much better for the shareholders. So, never mind. At some point, one "game changing revolutionary breakthrough" will actually break through something and change some game. Or, my mum will die of old age, bitching about those stupid pseudo "cars" that their grand kids can't use to visit her because the battery is too small. (No, wait, HN tells my mum will actually not die, thanks to some "game changing AI-powered breakthrough in biotech") |