|
|
|
|
|
by anothermathbozo
471 days ago
|
|
Looks like o1 performance without reasoning. Pretty good but seems reasonable that they didn’t want to call this 5 as they’ve already got a product out there that is as performant. Another notable thing here is a big drop in hallucination rate as measured by their benchmarks (for whatever those are worth). |
|
EDIT: Its 30 times more expensive than 4o lol