| > yes Can you explain why you think this? The financial outlook isn't good, not terrible but still. "No Capacity for New Commitments
State Faces Annual Multiyear Deficits of Around $20b" [1] >Indeed. And the Blue States have way more money than most of the Red states. Based on what? Note that GDP doesn't represent available funds to state governments >But many sides can play this game once the can of worms is open Trump has already threatened this to California. Two days ago Newsom asked congress for $20b and .. "Ric Grenell, a Trump ally serving as his envoy for special missions, said Friday that “there will be conditions” to any federal aid for the state. He said one of the possible conditions being discussed was defunding the California Coastal Commission, which regulates coastal development and protects public beach access. Trump has criticized the agency as overly restrictive, bureaucratic and a hindrance to timely rebuilding efforts." >What do you think the Florida delegation in the Congress will do when faced with a prospect of not getting help? Why would you assume the Democrats would do that? [1]
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4939#:~:text=The%20st... |
The budget of California is $320B. This is more than the _entire_ discretionary budget of the US.
> "Ric Grenell, a Trump ally serving as his envoy for special missions, said Friday that “there will be conditions” to any federal aid for the state.
Yeah, these are public statements. I expect that there's frantic back-room dealing right now to make sure that the relief funds are not attached to any conditions. Because in the long-term, that will benefit the states that have money.
> Why would you assume the Democrats would do that?
Because the Democrats who are unwilling to play ball will not get re-elected. I'm not talking about this electoral cycle, this will take a bit more time. For Republicans, it took about 8 years to get from the Tea Party to MAGAs.