|
|
|
|
|
by seannicholls
5066 days ago
|
|
I'd like to know under what circumstances you think that a company or individual should, or would, pay for advertising which is not (by definition) used? even if it were at a different price, why would anyone pay for advertising, knowing full well that it would not be viewed? |
|
In case you're wondering about asynchronous ad-loading, i.e only load an ad when the tag scrolls into the viewport, no that is not a viable option because the world out there is crazily varied, and not everyone uses the latest nightly build of Chromium. There are a lot of bad javascript engines out there, so I wouldn't jump to assume that async loading of ads would work across the board. Trust me I've worked on this problem before.
As for why different pricing would work: what I had meant was billing post-facto.
So for example, you may have an IO saying you're buying 300k imps per day at $1 CPM viewed and $0.1 unviewed. At the end of the day you may have 150k viewed and 150k unviewed. You only pay $165 instead of $300
EDIT: I have bad arithmetics for an asian person