[littlestymaar]

> There's no way these professionals have 6000 hours of interesting content and there's no way they would pay $200/month to store it. They're just saving everything they ever record because it's free.

Some of these people have been streaming for 15 years, it's far from “everything they ever record” (and some content creators in twitter/bluesky links elsewhere in this discussion explicitly said they did select content).

Likely they would be more picky in their selection if they had to pay, but that doesn't mean they would be ready to pay something for a thousand hours instead of 100. 100 hours is a ridiculous amount!

> Implementing that feature would cost more money than it would ever make.

It's no more work than implementing a hard threshold. They did change the system in the first place, they could have made this change much better had they cared…