|
|
|
|
|
|
by copypasterepeat
487 days ago
|
|
|
I agree. At first I thought it was doing something very simple but I am not so sure anymore. When you check the condition for the swap, you realize it almost works counterproductively while i<j because it keeps pushing smaller numbers in the wrong direction, but then it starts "fixing" those mistakes when i>j. I don't find this intuitive at all. |
|
|