[andrewflnr]

Who said a hypothesis is automatically credible? Not me.

[MichaelZuo]

If they’re not credible… then why would any one care…?

Readers are just going to assume it’s random noise, or at least indistinguishable from noise, from a rando on the internet.

[andrewflnr]

That's equally true of all internet comments. None of us here on HN have or are claiming automatic credibility. We just make arguments that make sense to us. Feel free to close the tab if you don't find any value in this activity.

[MichaelZuo]

So then what makes your opinions “hypotheses”?

Sufficient chimpanzees with keyboards, or an LLM, can also type out every comment you’ve ever written, including the last few.

[andrewflnr]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypothesis

[MichaelZuo]

I clearly don’t think your opinions match the definition found in merriam webster… or else I wouldn’t have asked.

[swiftcoder]

You don't think his comment is "an assumption put forward for the purposes of discussion"? That seems a fairly low and generic bar for a comment to reach...