|
|
|
|
|
|
by worik
481 days ago
|
|
|
> And, to be fair, while I’m generally a small r republican, I’m seeing benefits of having a non politically aligned head of state One of the benefits of a constitutional monarchy is the head of state did not campaign for the position. |
|
|
It wraps ultimate power up in a contradiction, you have it but you can’t use it. Sure, technically you could but it would be your last act.
Another important aspect, the for and against is currently split between parties, so there’s somewhat of unification factor between parties on that divide as well.
It gets a lot of hate, because it is imperfect, but I don’t think it gets its fair shake. My views more of, if it ain’t broke is it really worth the risk changing it.