Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by curo 476 days ago
Or it's just a misleading headline
2 comments

The headline is correctly using the term according to the NHTSA definition as a requirement for the manufacturer to fix an unreasonable safety issue. Whether it is OTA does not change the fact that it is a recall any more than if a manufacturer sent someone onsite to fix a mechanical issue instead of having the vehicle owner bring it in.
If only a 5 second Google search could tell you: https://autocrypt.io/transformation-of-vehicle-recall/
The fact that this thread is full of people who envisioned a physical recall is evidence enough the word is misleading. If reuters was an industry journal, sure.
Uhh the point is for people to take it seriously. Which works.