[Eisenstein]

So this is 'lazy coders include stuff they haven't vetted and it is problematic' which is easy to dismiss as the fault of lazy coders, but I think we have learned that pushing the responsibility of fixing the problem onto the people we blame for causing it by being lazy doesn't work.

Not sure what to do at this point except to rebalance the risk vs reward in such a way that very few people would be comfortable taking the lazy way out when dealing with high-impact systems.

We would need to hold people accountable for the code they approve, like we do with licensed engineers. Otherwise the incentive structure for making it 'good enough' and pushing it out is so great that we could never hope for a day when some percentage of coders won't do it the lazy way.

This isn't an LLM problem, it is a development problem.