[PeterStuer]

Why not for now just applaud them for their actions rather than focus on some potential 3rd order plan?

Who knows what any of then might do in the future? For now I'm cheering for Deepseek, Meta and anyone publishing open models as I strongly believe that the potential "danger" of AI in the hands of everyone is far outstripped by the concrete dangers of AI dictated by a select small group of corps/gov symbionts.

[SequoiaHope]

The answer lies in the question I responded to. The commenter lauded the positive effects of Deepseek’s actions and lamented the loss of such positivity from OpenAI. But it’s important to understand that this didn’t happen by chance. These things happen because underdogs benefit more from goodwill than secrecy and selfishness, while established players benefit from dominance and control.

If we ignore that, we will let PR teams play us every time they claim altruism while serving themselves. It doesn’t mean Deepseek can’t also have good motives, but we must be clear that undercutting OpenAI while simultaneously building community goodwill is a smart move on their part to shift the market in their favor.

[dartos]

Is media literacy for tech marketing.

I wish it was easier to learn about media literacy

[brookst]

I agree with your sentiment, but there’s no harm in being aware that the rhetoric is just PR spin for the strategy the execs think will be the most profitable.

[SequoiaHope]

I wouldn’t go so far as to try to presume the state of mind of the execs. Maybe they really believe what they’re saying. But it’s also true that it benefits them to say it and my argument is simply that we should be mindful of that.

[SXX]

At least they are not founded as non-profit with some "greater good" mission or "safety" BS.

[actionfromafar]

Yeah, that would be too blatant. :)

Can't fool me twice. Not yet, wait a couple of years.

[_Algernon_]

Because we have seen this play out exactly as described so many times that that kind of naivety is not justifiable.