|
|
|
|
|
by gs17
490 days ago
|
|
That whole thing was debunked AFAIK. Well, it kind of self-debunked since the original tweet that was posted as a reply to said "over 150 years old", not "exactly slightly under 150 years old", and "a number in ISO8601 format", but see e.g.: https://iter.ca/post/1875-epoch/
DOGE has plenty of ways to demonstrate ineptitude without us making some new ones up. |
|