[anon373839]

Since the administration has openly stated that it intends to flout the judicial branch, I'm honestly curious to see how long the Supreme Court's majority stays attached to the position they staked in Trump v. US.

These are men (and woman) who have climbed the highest, most prestigious rung in the profession. Even if for purely egotistical reasons, it's hard to imagine they will have endless patience to watch the institution over which they preside become irrelevant.

[jerlam]

Unless they're corrupt and are only using their position to enrich themselves. What good is the institution if you can't make any money from it, especially when they see the other two branches doing the same?

[anon373839]

I may be wrong about this, but I don't think "grubby wealth accumulator" fits the psychological profile. I think these are people more interested in power and prestige, and to an extent ideology and legacy. As they weaken the institution, they weaken their own standing.

[EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK]

Yes, that's a tough one to solve. Will need to amend Constitution to allow President to appoint and fire judges at any time. As to the 3/4 of states requirement, a creative solution will have to be found. For example, split Alabama into 20 small states.

[sixothree]

They can be “replaced” so easily by him. In a few weeks we could have 19 justices serving. They’re subservient like the rest of the republicans. They aren’t the last wall against fascism. They will kiss the ring.