|
|
|
|
|
by KennyBlanken
486 days ago
|
|
No? Maybe you cloud kids don't know how this stuff works, but unmanaged just means you get silicon-level access and remote KVM. It's still the hosting company's responsibility to competently own, maintain, and repair the physical hardware. That includes monitoring. In the old days you had to run a script or install a package to hook into their monitoring....but with IPMI et al being standard they don't need anything from you to do their job. The only time a hosting company should be hands-off is when they're just providing rack space, power, and data. Anything beyond that is between you and them in a contract/agreement. Every time I hear Hetzner come up in the last few years it's been a story about them being incompetent. If they're not detecting things like CPU fan failures of their own hardware and they deployed new systems without properly testing them first, then that's just further evidence they're still slipping. |
|
That's one way it can work. There are a great many hosted server options out there from fully managed to fully unmanaged with price points to match. Selling a cheap server under the conditions "call us when it breaks" is a perfectly reasonable offering.