[Veserv]

5 GB/s per core would still be 40 Gbps per core, so only ~15% of their time would be spent in encryption. They spend 5x longer doing the non-encryption stuff.

Also, it would be silly to bottleneck your protocol implementation benchmark on encryption that would be shared amongst implementations because that does not highlight your overhead advantages. In addition, the benchmarking RFC explicitly allows for the null encryption case in benchmarking for exactly that reason.

[musjleman]

> Also, it would be silly to bottleneck your protocol implementation benchmark on encryption that would be shared amongst implementations because that does not highlight your overhead advantages

It would be great if benchmarks with no encryption were a thing.

There's massive overheads, and I explicitly avoided saying whether it's "fast" or not because to a lot of people serving 1000req/s seems "fast" and TLS is basically the main algorithmic complexity you'd expect from a data transfer protocol.