[saurik]

Your article isn't really about, though, how to speed up a debug build, and I thereby think you're likely not going to find the right audience. Like, to be honest, I gave up on your article, because while I found the premise of speeding up a debug build really interesting, I (currently) have no interest in hand-optimizing SIMD... but, in another time, or if I were someone else, I might find that really interesting, but then would not have thought to look at this article. "Hand-optimizing SHA-1 using SIMD intrinsics and assembly" is just a very different mental space than "making my debug build run 100x faster", even if they are two ways to describe the same activity. "Using SIMD and assembly to avoid relying on compiler optimizations for performance" also feels better? I would at least get it if your title was a pun or a joke or was in some way fun--at which point I would blame Hacker News for pulling articles out of their context and not having a good policy surrounding publicly facing titles or subtitles--but it feels like, in this case, the title is merely a poor way to describe the content.

[nottorp]

Could be that he did it for fun and not to reach a target audience?

[usefulcat]

If so that's perfectly fine, but I still agree with saurik--the title is rather misleading. The article is mainly about how to speed up SHA (without using compiler optimizations).