[scarab92]

> AfD is a Nazi party.

It feels inappropriate that progressives have decided that it's okay to use Nazi as a generic insult for mainstream right wing parties. It waters down the true horrors of the Nazi party.

Anyway, as to censorship coming from Germany:

"Germany submits the highest number of legal demands for user data to X within the European Union, with ~87% of these requests targeting speech-related offenses. "

https://x.com/GlobalAffairs/status/1891593848771707233

[phendrenad2]

It's more complicated than that, in this case. They aren't simply insulting AfD by calling it a Nazi party. There is some truth to it, in that AfD almost certainly has Nazis in it. A prominent AfD member has used the phrase "all for Germany" that was also used by the Nazis. They also openly say that they want to take down holocaust memorials and stop talking about it.

Personally, I think that the full accusation of Nazism should be reserved for when it's really needed. But I assume that Germans know better than I do how to go about keeping Nazis out of their country.

[torlok]

Your source is Elon Musk. AfD is not just "a mainstream right-wing party".

[scarab92]

Sure it is. Their policies are comparable to the those of the current trump administration.

[torlok]

That says a lot about the current Trump administration, not the other way around.

[ruune]

Germany is also the biggest market in the EU. Without actual numbers this proves nothing. And with a platform that primarily relies on speech I struggle to come up with a huge list of non-speech-related offenses that could come up. Also, we're taking about a platform owned by an heavily opinionated US gov official here, come on...