It's strange to see so many negative responses that start with vague emotional language. It's almost as if a lot of critics didn't read the presentation. Or maybe they think the rest of us didn't read it.
I read the whole presentation. The physics experiment criticism Guttman makes that I referred to is at page 16/30. Nothing after that engages with QC to the extent that the first half of the presentation did, so I didn't refer to later parts.
Good question. Yes it is strange, because the information on the slides is mainly numerical. For example the integers "15" and "21" and the years "2002" and "2012" don't pack much of an emotional charge for me. I suspect they wouldn't for most people.