|
|
|
|
|
by diggan
493 days ago
|
|
Considering they don't talk about licensing, one can assume this is proprietary? ~2 years ago (Sep 27, 2023), Mistral AI said: > we believe that an open approach to generative AI is necessary. Community-backed model development is the surest path to fight censorship and bias in a technology shaping our future. We strongly believe that by training our own models, releasing them openly, and fostering community contributions, we can build a credible alternative to the emerging AI oligopoly. Open-weight generative models will play a pivotal role in the upcoming AI revolution. > Mistral AI’s mission is to spearhead the revolution of open models. https://mistral.ai/en/news/about-mistral-ai Did something change since then, or why did they have a change of hearts? Are they just doing a "OpenAI" and appear to believe in something in order to further their own cause, or does it have some particular reason behind it? |
|
> Mistral Saba is a result of working closely with strategic regional customers to address very specific challenges in addressing bespoke use cases.
It seems like a customer paid them to train this model, so presumably that customer gets to decide on licensing terms.
Isn’t this Mistral’s business model? Make general purpose models available as open-source and train more specific models for their customers?