> The Privacy Act [of 1974] makes it unlawful for OPM Defendants to hand over access to OPM's millions of personnel records to DOGE Defendants, who lack a lawful and legitimate need for such access," the lawsuit said. "No exception to the Privacy Act covers DOGE Defendants' access to records held by OPM
Isn't justifying need a walk in the park? "We've been asked by the president to downsize the federal government - so we need to know about who's in the federal government". Am I missing something?