|
|
|
|
|
by bballfan133
484 days ago
|
|
I really dislike this talking point. 1) That people who don't enjoy what they see are just unsophisticated. 2) That today's basketball is better because players have more skill and plays are more complex. I don't think that's the point at all. I've personally found it hard to sit through games this season - it feels like there isn't much at stake. What happens in the first quarter is a mere blip. And even in the fourth, it seems like just which shots happen to go in by chance. I feel like the Thinking Basketball approach might be exactly what's unenjoyable - devaluing individual moments for the sake of theory. |
|
"Too many threes" is a more novel complaint but one that should self-correct in a couple of ways:
* the passing/screens/movement that leads to a good look at a three is often pretty fun
* taking bad threes has a lot less mathematical advantage and as defenses get better at shutting down the schemes for the good ones, the best teams will adjust what other looks they try to generate
I would also be fine with moving the line back, or getting rid of the corner three entirely. The fixed-distance shot is an easier skill than being able to hit jumpers from various distances so as long as its easy-enough then you're never gonna see players who don't otherwise have much offensive game train themselves to be 3pt specialists.