Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by aredox 492 days ago
Are you dense? The VAT applies to all purchases and doesn't discriminate on where an item is produced.

Have Americans become really that dumb?

3 comments

The majority of Americans have not been exposed to VAT. Most people see a thing that has value and don’t want to think of each step in manufacturing, and try to reconcile that. To even educated Americans, it takes some thinking to understand both what VAT is and why it’s beneficial over us based sales tax.

The mistake I think Vance made was assuming that Europe doesn’t tax its own vehicles 30%. If he wants to “reciprocate” by impose higher taxes on BMWs, Mercedes, and Audis so I don’t have to deal with their drivers egos every time i go on the highway, let him. This is not a product class that is adding much value to our society in my opinion. I would hope they aren’t so difficult on Honda/Toyota since both brands provide good reliable cars while US manufacturers try to get their shit together

Why would US car manufacturers try to get their shit together with even less competition?
> Have Americans become really that dumb?

It’s not a question of being dumb or not, but rather that VAT doesn’t exist in the US so most people don’t understand how it works, if they have even heard of it at all.

Instead of VAT, most states have sales tax, which is similar in spirit but doesn’t work the same way.

There is absolutely nothing, at any step, that takes into account where an item has been produced when the VAT is calculated. You don't need to know anything about VAT to understand at least this very tiny, simple and obvious fact.

But apparently facts don't mean anything anymore in that crazy country there.

The linked article explains VAT.

Being confidently wrong in the comment section is dumb and arrogant.

I mean, I get it to some extent, but there's literally an article linked on this whole thread that we're all commenting, explaining why not...
I think it's more a case of intellectual dishonesty.
Yeah and no. I would see intellectual dishonesty as worst and the fact that we did not called it that for years enabled these people. They were giving all possible benefits of the doubt. And calling them dumb is kind of benefit of the doubt.