[pxx]

did you? the title and content of this post is about math results. you should really consider the possibility that you're very wrong here.

the discussion is about hypothetical results from classical mechanics, which, along with the rest of physics, is a mathematical model that may be incongruous with observations.

[aipatselarom]

>What situations in classical physics are non-deterministic?

Sorry, I didn't take my crazy pills today.

To me it is very clear that the question involves physics from the start.

[cycomanic]

I suggest you read the HN guidelines, you are quite abrasive and aggressive in your posts.

Regarding your post about entropy. The reason it does not apply is because entropy is a concept from statistical mechanics which is about the statistics of ensembles of many (even non-classical) particles. It's a concept invented after Newton dynamics, but does not apply to describing the equations of motion of a single particle (try to define the entropy of the single particle system). Time reversal is a core tenent of Newton dynamics.

[aipatselarom]

Read the title of this post, and the title of the question in the exchange, I will post it yet again, *sigh*

>What situations in classical physics are non-deterministic?

Is "statistical mechanics" contained within "classical physics"?

Yes or no? No need for a nonsensical philosophical essay.

[cycomanic]

Maybe you should read my most, I didn't say that statistical mechanics is nonclassical. I said statistical mechanics does not apply to the discussion of a single particle rolling up or down a slope. Tell me which of the states has more entropy the one with the particle at the top od the Norton dome or the one at the bottom?