Better. I still feel like there's an element of explanations there nearly as opaque as "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors",
but I can mostly forgive it.
Clearly the review is written for someone already familiar with GIS terms.
For example,
"The geometry type represents spatial objects in a planar space using Cartesian geometry, assuming all calculations, including distance and area measurements, are performed on a flat surface."
says nothing that couldn't be better stated as "this is for flat-projection maps, like the Mercator".