|
|
|
|
|
|
by anonylizard
483 days ago
|
|
|
If one compares O3-mini's coding abilities to the original GPT-4. It is as large as GPT-3 to GPT-4 gap GPT-3: Useful as autocomplete. Still error prone, but vastly better than any pre-AI autocomplete GPT-4: Already capable of independently coding up simple functions based on natural language. O3-mini: Can code in say top 5% of codeforces. There's a 2 years gap between each of them. More over, intelligence has a superexponential return, 90IQ->100IQ < 100IQ->110IQ in terms of returns. |
|
|
That's the second time I've seen the claim that linear increases in intelligence have "superexponential" results, first time was Altman's blog.
But I've not seen any justification for this.
(As you specifically say IQ, note that an IQ is defined as a mapping of standard deviations rather than a mapping of absolute skill, the normal mapping is 15 points being 1σ).