|
|
|
|
|
by code_runner
488 days ago
|
|
this is SUPER interesting actually. I definitely didn't realize this. I'm still probably going to use a small army of CTEs for this sort of stuff, but I'm very interested to give this a shot the next time I'm exploring a dataset. |
|
With today's pipe syntax CTEs are still needed to deal with teeing situations (multiple references to a single table) but for just a chain of transforms it is a lot simpler.