|
|
|
|
|
|
by zimpenfish
493 days ago
|
|
|
> Disney retorted [...] tenuous waiver They've since backtracked on that retort though and accepted the court process[0]. Although their first response was nothing to do with arbitration[1]. Their lawyers are flip-floppers. [0] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/disn... [1] "Disney made no mention of arbitration, instead arguing it was not liable because it has no control over Raglan’s operations or management and merely serves as its landlord." |
|
|