Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by theultdev 489 days ago
That's completely false.

I was off on the numbers though.

So Trump reduced it from 4,500 to 2,500 mid Jan 2021.

Point is, terrible execution on the pull out.

Leave from the base, take the equipment.

Don't trust terrorists to run security.

300 people died because Biden is an idiot.
1 comments
seanmcdirmid 489 days ago
Again, Trump left Biden with a token force, there was no way that was going to work out for him, you just can’t drop more troops in when the security situations degrades but you are leaving. And Trump didn’t care about those soldiers deaths, his disdain for the military is well documented, this was a political win for him, it makes sense why he invited the taliban to 9/11 remembrance ceremony. The guy is just the worst kind of life form.
link
theultdev 489 days ago
Why leave the base that has more security and airfields just to use the local airfield and rely on terrorists to run security because you pulled the troops out first?

It's not that he was pulling them out. It's HOW he pulled them out.

If it were a Republican you would have criticized that shit show too.

link
seanmcdirmid 489 days ago
Because you didn’t have the troops to secure it. Isn’t t obvious? You don’t have the troops to secure your own base, and you have to rely on the party Trump made his deal with that was binding to Biden. It was lose lose for Biden and win win for trump.
link
theultdev 489 days ago
???

The final 2500 were pulled out of Bagram by Biden.

THEN the evacuation was done by 500 troops at the local airfield by flying in.

If you knew it would collapse, why not fly everyone out when the 2500 troops were there and the airbase was still functional.

They even acted like they trusted the Afghan government for the 1 week it was still there.

It's not about losing or winning. Biden got 300 people killed.

link
seanmcdirmid 489 days ago
From wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93Taliban_...:

> The agreement stipulated fighting restrictions for both the US and the Taliban, and provided for the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for the Taliban's counter-terrorism commitments. The US agreed to an initial reduction of its force level from 13,000 to 8,600 within 135 days (i.e. by July 2020), followed by a full withdrawal within 14 months (i.e. by 1 May 2021) if the Taliban kept its commitments. The United States also committed to closing five military bases within 135 days, and expressed its intent to end economic sanctions on the Taliban by August 27, 2020. The agreement was welcomed by Pakistan, China, Russia and India,[4][7][8] and unanimously endorsed by the UN Security Council.[9]

> Insurgent attacks against the Afghan security forces, however, surged in the aftermath of the deal, with thousands killed. However, withdrawals per the agreement continued. By January 2021, just 2,500 US troops remained in the country, and NATO forces fully evacuated by the end of that summer. The US completed its full evacuation on August 30, 2021, as the Taliban took control of the country by force.

> Critics of the deal claimed that the then Trump administration appeased the Taliban and ignored the then Afghan government for a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan.[10]

link
theultdev 489 days ago
Where does the deal say you have to pull the troops out before the civilians?

How is how Biden executed the final withdraw Trump's fault?

link