Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by imglorp 492 days ago
Yes, that's where we went wrong.

I feel that early on, we should have had the foresight to press the microtransaction option much harder. There could have been a widely adopted standard where you load your browser or UA with money and then individual sites visited could be given permission to debit some amount per page load, hour consumed, or whatever. I would rather pay a few cents to read an article or watch a video than have surveillance capitalism ruin everything for everyone. It's not about the ads, it's about the ecosystem.
5 comments
flir 492 days ago
Ever heard the expression "bad money drives out good"?

Free content drives out paid-for content. It would only take a tiny percentage of sites going ad-supported. All the users would rush to them, the microtransaction sites would see this, and they would soon change their models.

link
monday40 492 days ago
Or, since we pay for access to the internet, let's say like $80 per month for home connection, plus $20 per month for phone data, and the internet providers know the websites we visit (in Australia they have to keep this information for 2 years), and can approximate how much time we spend there, they could redistribute part of the $100 (50%?) to the website owners automatically.
link
jmathai 492 days ago
Sounds like Brave Attention Tokens [1]. It might have been a hard sell 3 decades ago when we didn't realize it would turn out like it has.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_(web_browser)#Business_m...

link
makeitdouble 492 days ago
Credit card payment security was in a dire state, and EC wasn't even really a thing yet, so paying anything online was just a huge barrier.

Even in retrospect I'm not sure what monetisation would have been widely accepted in 1990.

link
giantrobot 492 days ago
That sounds just as bad if not worse than what we have today. You'd have to outright pay for your hardware, electricity, connectivity, and then on top pay for every piece of content. Browsing would suck as there would only be bad mechanisms for previewing content before deciding to access it (and being charged). Enshittification would still happen just like with cable television and video streaming. You'd have to pay for access but then still have ads and tracking on top.
link
PaulHoule 492 days ago
Who knows? If we had micropayments we certainly would have had a lot of fraud around them,.

I'm sure, however, that we haven't seen how bad it gets on our current track.

Last summer I watched a lot of Tubi, which is a free advertising streaming service which has the lower tier of content that you might see on broadcast TV or cable plus generous helpings of old movies, subprime anime [1], subtitled Italian crime dramas, etc.

The ads started out really polite, with heavy rotation of ads for P&G brands like Dawn and Tide featuring black people cleaning up [2]. None of the personal injury lawyers, prescription drug ads, ads for legal and illegal medicare frauds, etc. I gave my email addresses and they mixed in a light tranche of retargeted ads from brands I'd engaged with long ago and who were famous for using retargeted ads on the web in the day.

The adtech revolution is half about tech and half about brands that take advantage of the new medium and it's certain Tubi is in the honeymoon phase today because they're still willing to lose money. Investors will expect to take profits someday, and by then cable will be gone, broadcast will suffer from neglect [4] and the ads will get worse, much worse.

I think we'll see more businesses centered around running bad ads everywhere, the only respite might be that some platforms like Amazon and Temu get so big that they trap many businesses into using them as their exclusive channel and starve other channels.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juden_Chan but also some good older stuff like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranma_%C2%BD and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accel_World

[2] their own messes

[3] https://www.avclub.com/tubi-success-hasnt-turned-profit-stre...

[4] even a few years ago the kind of normcore people who used to watch broadcast TV would seem to think I was doing some kind of hacking when I put up an antenna to get OTA television

link