|
|
|
|
|
by Skinney
495 days ago
|
|
> Not necessarily. You can just commit your changes... Saves me from doing that extra commit, then. > [...] it is suitable primarily for very short-lived tasks that prevent you from committing changes to a branch. That's also a thing I like about jj. Nothing prevents me from committing changes. Even merge conflicts are commited, so I know I can always come back to it later. I find I think less about when to commit my work in jj. In Git I find that I like to commit to avoid loosing work, in addition to commiting when I feel "done" with part of a change. It's a small thing, really, but it feels quite big (for me). |
|