|
|
|
|
|
by fsckboy
494 days ago
|
|
>the court’s ruling that West’s headnotes are copyrightable even when they merely quote a court opinion verbatim, because the editorial decision to quote the material itself shows a “creative spark” ... when Ross paid human annotators to write their own versions of the headnotes, they really did crib from West’s wholesale rather than doing their own independent analysis ... so it follows that it was then Ross's annotators showing the creative spark |
|