|
|
|
|
|
|
by orf
492 days ago
|
|
|
None of this makes any sense. A lack of CRL doesn’t make TLS insecure. A root doesn’t produce “self-signed certificates”. That especially doesn’t make any sense. What do you think the “self” references in “self-signed” certificate? Add the root to your trust store, if you trust it, and you’re done. What’s more concerning is someone working on (assumingly) secure, sensitive, air-gapped networks knows this little about TLS? |
|
|