|
|
|
|
|
|
by pentel-0_5
487 days ago
|
|
|
Except you made the failure of assumption that it would be of random people exactly like jury duty. I contend that it would be better to pick from a pool of professionals who, as part of their entrance into a professional society, agree also to lend their talents to civic duty for the benefit of all. |
|
|
We already have a word for those people - politicians.
Why is a random lot better than an election, and having the public at least ostensibly vet the candidates and choose one?