|
|
|
|
|
by llm_trw
497 days ago
|
|
>So let me get this straight- we are going to train AI models to perform screen recognition of some kind (so it can ascertain layout and detect the "important" ui elements), and additionally ask that AI to OCR all text on the screen so it has some hope of being able to follow some natural language instructions (OCR being a task which, as a HN thread a day or two ago pointed out, AI is exceedingly bad at), and then we're going to be able to tell this non-deterministic prediction engine what we want to do with our software, and it's just going to do it? AI is amazing at OCR, we've had tesseract ocr for 40 years and if you read the fine manual it has essentially a 0% error rate per character. OCR on VLMs is terrible. For some reason consistent x-heights between 10 to 30 pixels with guaranteed mono-column layout is not something venture capitalists get excited about, and as a result I'm not the founder of a unicorn. |
|
That being said, I thought the purpose of OCR was to take text from a non-digital source and make it digital.
Why should we have to OCR something that exists already in a perfectly interchangeable digital format already?