Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fra 494 days ago
Because you won't find anyone competent to take on the terrible shit-shoveling gig that is being the CEO for an equal share in the business.
1 comments

I think in an employee owned model the CEO is less visible and a different role, that role is then incentivized to actually drive the business instead of creating hype in the market to ensure valuation for investors/stock markets.

The value of an employee owned business is that you can vote the CEO out if they’re not working in the best interests.

With all due respect, I don't think you know what a CEO does day to day. Investor relations and PR is ~5% of the job at an early stage startup.
Frankly what the CEO actually does day-to-day doesn’t matter relative to a startup or a publicly traded tech company, or anything in between in the scope of ownership and organized employee value.

I’ve watched a company in deep debt spiral out of control because the CEO didn’t understand the business and let bottom up management be how the company runs. The board that also didn’t understand the business just let 3 rounds of layoffs occur before forcing the CEO out. When layoffs come, if it is going to be the employees who pay the price, they should have a mechanism to push the pilot out of the seat before it costs them.