[cloverich]

IMO, that's an equally weak argument. "The free market's internet 20 years ago was terrible. Therefore, all conceivable free market plans for the internet could would have been draconion and awful."

To be clear, I'm not arguing the Government funds did not play the biggest role - or even that it wasn't the best solution available. It doesn't matter if it was. Im only arguing that pointing to an example of something invented under government funded research is not justification for blanket, undirected increase in government funding. But that's how that argument is used.