|
|
|
|
|
by snailmailstare
495 days ago
|
|
When I worked with nosql I always thought switching to postgres was the way to go since whatever nosql devs do essentially gets a competitive feature integrated into postgres. But when you look beyond the core, postgres seems like it lets any terrible hack fill a role.. I mean why can't I setup a few interconnected databases and send my write commands to any one of them and have them succeed or fail with normal transaction semantics obscuring unnecessary details? I think every modern attempt at a non trivial database has a better solution than Patroni. |
|