[chandlerc1024]

(Carbon lead here)

We tried other names, but we found collisions with essentially all of them. =/ We ended up picking a "least bad", and actually talked to a couple of folks familiar with the old usage to see if it was a worse collision than we realized. They weren't delighted but generally shrugged. So here we are. =/

It's definitely not perfect, but I think it's much more searchable than "C" or some other choices. Ultimately, I think its at least not bad enough to matter compared to the actual project.

[phaedryx]

Why not create a word/name? e.g. Clojure

[chandlerc1024]

We played with some, but none stuck.

A big goal was being short and easily pronounced, including by non-native English speakers, in a recognizable way from reading the text. That made the overwhelming majority of "fun" spellings not work well.

On one hand, I feel like we're just not as good at naming as Rust and Zig. Both of those names are :chefskiss:

On the other hand, Carbon does have a bunch of awesome puns waiting for us... So we've got that going for us. =D

[thechao]

Hey, Chandler— this article says you're using "c++0x" concepts. Is that Indiana-style concepts?

[chandlerc1024]

It was also called that.

But it isn't that we're directly using this, but that definition checked generics are fairly similar to the ideas in that series of proposals, and that led to the generics in Swift. Also closely related to the generics in Rust, etc.

[theanonymousone]

Cloce