[wyldfire]

That doesn't seem like an appropriate comparison to the task the blogger did. The blogger gave their AI thing the raw data - and a different prompt from the one you gave. If you gave it a raster image, that's "cheating" - these models were trained to recognize things in images.

[taberiand]

To be fair, if someone gave me a bunch of raw data points and not the png I wouldn't see the monkey either

[PunchTornado]

In the article they also give the png

[wyldfire]

> When a png is directly uploaded, the model is better able to notice that some strange pattern is present in the data. However, it still does not recognize the pattern as a gorilla.

I wonder if the conversation context unfairly weighed the new impression towards the previous interpretation.

[blharr]

I'm curious if there's any good resources on this, but I've noticed including the conversation context makes the responses drastically worse quality in my experience. It's gotten to a point whe