Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dylan604 501 days ago
> Requirements are clear, the technology is well known. From the beginning.

Is that really a true statement, even for Starliner? The US Gov't is infamous for changing plans/designs well into the process for many items which is the key reason for cost overruns and blown deadlines. I didn't follow Starliner's development process at all, but I would be shocked if from the beginning the requirements didn't change.
1 comments
b_davis_ 501 days ago
that mismatch between risk / requirements and the type of contract is the root of this whole problem.

if it was cost plus, the government would have had an incentive to no push for changes, since they would have been paying for it.

and yes, Boeing should have said no. but, politics.

link
jjk166 501 days ago
Requirement changes on cost plus contracts are endemic. And it's not one way - typically the pipeline is starting to work on the project with requirement A under the assumption it will cost X, find out a decent way through that it's going to cost way more than X, then change to requirements B under the assumption it will only cost Y, repeat two or three times.
link