Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tptacek 494 days ago
It's not Wikipedia, right? Getting the maximum number of contributors isn't a stated goal? I'm a C programmer with a fair bit of kernel experience, and they don't want me, I'm pretty sure, and I'm completely fine with that.
1 comments

Wikipedia has plenty of gatekeeping too. I once had to submit a single edit three times before the moderators safeguarding the article begrudgingly accepted it.
They do, but they have a stated goal of maximizing contribution. Linux does not, right? I'm asking.
"Maximum number", perhaps not, but Greg KH did at one point want new contributors: https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/2ny1lz/im_greg_kroah...

Q: What would make you even more happy with Linux? GregKH: If you contribute to it.

The kernel dev process is more pathological than what I deal with at $DAYJOB.

Why the hell would I wish that upon myself?

A stable career where you can move to any of the companies who have a dependency on your subsystem.
But I already have that
Different Wikipedia communities have different governance policies. In the math wikis there's generally a rule that small fixes are not allowed. This stops people from arguing whether slightly better explained sentences are the right edits.