|
|
|
|
|
by thephyber
491 days ago
|
|
More accurately, it was to preserve employment relationships. Historically, once mass layoffs happen, they are contagious. Once unemployment rates rise, companies plan to cut costs to ride out a recession. Also, once employees are unemployed for an extended period of time (something like 9+ months), their odds of finding similarly paying work drop permanently. It was in everybody’s best interest to reduce the employer-employee churn. |
|
And sure, the when the government transfers large amounts of money it's like moving water with a leaky bucket and in this case maybe a colander, but I'd rather be sitting here 5 years later complaining about fraud than a depression.